• Link to X
  • Link to Mail
Tel: +44 20 7229 2729
Bayswater Institute
  • Home
  • About
    • Priya Davda
    • Ken Eason
    • William Maton-Howarth
    • Alexander Hebden
    • Harini Sivaji
    • Simon Bell
    • Corinna Arndt
    • Paul Tucker
    • Aki Ho
    • Gillian Gregory
    • Sara Bhandari
    • Trustees
    • Lisl Klein
    • Harold Bridger
    • Privacy Policy
  • Research & Evaluation
  • Professional Development
    • Wisdom in Groups
    • Workshops
    • Masterclasses
    • Professional Coaching
  • Partners
  • Case Studies
  • News
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Tag Archive for: HIC

Action Learning across the Decades: Case Studies in Health and Social Care Settings 1966 & 2016

in Publications/by FiDeeEdit1

Comparison of the Hospital Internal Communications (HIC) project of the 1960s with the Better Outcomes for People with Learning Disabilities (BOLDTC) project in 2016 and their use of action learning approaches

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore how action learning concepts were used in two healthcare projects undertaken many decades apart. The specific purpose in both cases was to examine how action learning can contribute to shared learning across key stakeholders in a complex socio-technical system. In each case study, action learning supported joint design programmes and the sharing of perspectives about the complex system under investigation.

Design/methodology/approach – Two action learning projects are described: first, the Hospital Internal Communications (HIC) project led by Reg Revans in the 1960s. Senior staff in ten London hospitals formed action learning teams to address communication issues. Second, in the Better Outcomes for People with Learning Disabilities: Transforming Care (BOLDTC) project, videoconferencing equipment enabled people with learning disabilities to increase their opportunities to communicate. A mutual learning process was established to enable stakeholders to explore the potential of the technical system to improve individual care.

Findings – The HIC project demonstrated the importance of evidence being shared between team members and that action had to engage the larger healthcare system outside the hospital. The BOLDTC project concerned the continuing relevance of action learning to healthcare today. Mutual learning was achieved between health and social care specialists and technologists.

Originality/value – This work draws together the socio-technical systems tradition (considering both social and technical issues in organisations) and action learning to demonstrate that complex systems development needs to be undertaken as a learning process in which action provides the fuel for learning and design.

Action Learning across the Decades: Case Studies in Health and Social Care Settings 1966 & 2016 HIC BOLDTC Ken Eason

Emerald Insight Link

Eason K. D. Action learning across the decades: case studies in health and social care settings 1966 and 2016 Leadership in the Health Services, 30(2) 118-128
https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-11-2016-0057

https://www.bayswaterinst.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/header-logo-white-blend-deeper-top.png 0 0 FiDeeEdit1 https://www.bayswaterinst.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/header-logo-white-blend-deeper-top.png FiDeeEdit12017-12-07 13:22:482017-12-14 13:33:18Action Learning across the Decades: Case Studies in Health and Social Care Settings 1966 & 2016
Search Search

Categories

  • All Articles (72)
  • Case Studies (9)
  • Homeworking (7)
  • Methods (19)
  • Mindful Stories (33)
  • News (73)
  • Publications (63)
  • Resources (3)
  • Wisdom in Groups Blog (5)
  • Workshops (3)

Recent Posts

  • Calling All Digital App Developers in Health and Social Care. Can an Online Clinic give you a head start with two critical issues?
  • Pathways to Market for Tech Companies Seeking R&D Funding
  • WORKTECC: Workforce Operations that Realise Knowledge-based Transformational Efficiency gains in Community Care
  • Evaluating the West London Primary Care Navigator Scheme
  • Project Evaluations in the Local Government Association (LGA) Social Care Digital Innovation Programme (SCDIP)

Archives

  • November 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017

Themes

Action Research Automation Climate Change Covid-19 Double Task Electronic Journals Electronic Patient Records Embedding Technology in Practice Ergonomics Evaluation Fear Formations of Terror Group Dynamics Human Factors Imagine Imagine Method Information and Communication Technology ICT Information Systems Information Technology Integration Mindful Stories National Programme for Information Technology NHS NPfIT Organisational Change Organisational Development Policy Problem Structuring Method Project Fear Comic Realistic Evaluation Rich Pictures Social Value / Impact Sociotechnical Systems Sociotechnical Systems Theory Soft Systems Methodology Stakeholder Participation Sustainability Sustainable Development Telecare Telehealth Telemedicine Triple Task Weaponised Fear Wisdom in Groups Work
© Copyright – Bayswater Institute 2017 | Website Design – dwmultimedia.co.uk
  • Link to X
  • Link to Mail
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top