• Link to X
  • Link to Mail
Tel: +44 20 7229 2729
Bayswater Institute
  • Home
  • About
    • Priya Davda
    • Ken Eason
    • William Maton-Howarth
    • Alexander Hebden
    • Harini Sivaji
    • Simon Bell
    • Corinna Arndt
    • Paul Tucker
    • Aki Ho
    • Gillian Gregory
    • Sara Bhandari
    • Trustees
    • Lisl Klein
    • Harold Bridger
    • Privacy Policy
  • Research & Evaluation
  • Professional Development
    • Wisdom in Groups
    • Workshops
    • Masterclasses
    • Professional Coaching
  • Partners
  • Case Studies
  • News
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Towards Understanding Problem Structuring and Groups with Triple Task Methodology ‘e’

in Publications/by FiDeeEdit1

Abstract:

Towards Understanding Problem Structuring and Groups with Triple Task Methodology ‘e’ Simon BellThe many issues which confront Problem Structuring Groups (PSGs) engaging in applying problem structuring methods (PSMs) are well reported in the literature. Often group problem structuring work is well organised around an array of processes and methods which has received wide-ranging testing in the field however, the assessment of the group in terms of its output, group dynamic and self-assessment tends to be handled piecemeal at best. Triple task methodology (TTM) has been described as a means to manage the three group assessments— group output, dynamic and self-assessment in one frame. In this paper an experimental version of TTM (TTMe) is described in use in an Education project setting in Abu Dhabi. It was intended to make TTM less cumbersome and time consuming and, at the same time, more systemically integrated, a significant objective being to make it easier to use by practitioners who have not used it before or who have only small prior use of group assessment methods. The paper describes the application of TTMe, provides an overall assessment of the value of the exercise, discusses the outputs of the group work and points to the value of TTMe in identifying and clarifying unique group qualities or signatures. The major contribution of the paper is to bring to PSG processes a degree of rapid, non-specialist, empirically comparable assessment on the richness of the group use of PSMs.

Springer Link

Bell, S., Mahroum, S. and Yassin, N. (2016). Towards understanding problem structuring and groups with triple task methodology ‘e’. Journal of the Operational Research Society. doi:10.1057/s41274-016-0017-2

Tags: Problem Structuring Groups, Problem Structuring Method, Triple Task, TTMe
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail
https://www.bayswaterinst.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/header-logo-white-blend-deeper-top.png 0 0 FiDeeEdit1 https://www.bayswaterinst.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/header-logo-white-blend-deeper-top.png FiDeeEdit12017-11-06 21:37:372017-12-17 13:23:33Towards Understanding Problem Structuring and Groups with Triple Task Methodology ‘e’
You might also like
Understanding Stakeholder Participation in Research as Part of Sustainable Development
DPSIR = A Problem Structuring Method? An Exploration from the ‘‘Imagine’’ Approach
Groups and Facilitators within Problem Structuring Processes
Triple Task Method: Systemic, Reflective Action Research
Search Search

Categories

  • All Articles (72)
  • Case Studies (9)
  • Homeworking (7)
  • Methods (19)
  • Mindful Stories (33)
  • News (73)
  • Publications (63)
  • Resources (3)
  • Wisdom in Groups Blog (5)
  • Workshops (3)

Recent Posts

  • Calling All Digital App Developers in Health and Social Care. Can an Online Clinic give you a head start with two critical issues?
  • Pathways to Market for Tech Companies Seeking R&D Funding
  • WORKTECC: Workforce Operations that Realise Knowledge-based Transformational Efficiency gains in Community Care
  • Evaluating the West London Primary Care Navigator Scheme
  • Project Evaluations in the Local Government Association (LGA) Social Care Digital Innovation Programme (SCDIP)

Archives

  • November 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017

Themes

Action Research Automation Climate Change Covid-19 Double Task Electronic Journals Electronic Patient Records Embedding Technology in Practice Ergonomics Evaluation Fear Formations of Terror Group Dynamics Human Factors Imagine Imagine Method Information and Communication Technology ICT Information Systems Information Technology Integration Mindful Stories National Programme for Information Technology NHS NPfIT Organisational Change Organisational Development Policy Problem Structuring Method Project Fear Comic Realistic Evaluation Rich Pictures Social Value / Impact Sociotechnical Systems Sociotechnical Systems Theory Soft Systems Methodology Stakeholder Participation Sustainability Sustainable Development Telecare Telehealth Telemedicine Triple Task Weaponised Fear Wisdom in Groups Work
© Copyright – Bayswater Institute 2017 | Website Design – dwmultimedia.co.uk
  • Link to X
  • Link to Mail
Link to: Rich Pictures: Sustainable Development and Stakeholders – The Benefits of Content Analysis Link to: Rich Pictures: Sustainable Development and Stakeholders – The Benefits of Content Analysis Rich Pictures: Sustainable Development and Stakeholders – The Benefits of... Link to: The Double Task Link to: The Double Task Double Task LogoThe Double Task
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top